Wishes and Hopes Are Not Enough to Recommend Syntroleum
Syntroleum (SYNM) is a fuel technology company. The company has developed 3 technologies:
Syntroleum®: The process of converting natural gas stock into Fischer-Tropsch (FT) wax. FT has a variety of industrial uses, including in the rubber, cosmetics, ink, and coatings industries. Additionally, FT wax is used as a feed product for...
Bio-Synfining®: A process used to convert biomass such as recycled vegetable cooking oil (e.g., from restaurants), animal waste fats, soybean and algal oil, etc., to synthetic diesel, naphtha, and LPGs.
I believe the best way to think of Syntroleum is as an intellectual property (IP) development firm. The business model is to license the above technologies to partners that wish to construct plants to produce synthetic fuels, earning an up-front technology licensing fee and collecting both royalties and service support revenues from their licensees.
The only technology in production is Bio-Synfining, with which Syntroleum partnered with Tyson Foods (TSN) in 2007 to create Dynamic Fuels LLC. The partnership successfully opened their Geismar, Louisiana plant in 2010. At present, this plant is churning out synthetic diesel which has been used by Royal Dutch Airlines (KLMR), Alaska Air (ALK), and the U.S. Navy. Syntroleum owns an equity stake in Dynamic Fuels, earns royalties from it, and collects technical service fees from it as well. In fact, the vast majority of Syntroleum's cash flows are dependent on revenues from Dynamic Fuels.
An analysis of Syntroleum as an investment opportunity is not real positive. Synthetic diesel demand is largely government-driven, stemming from the Energy Policy Act of 2005 where the EPA sets annual quotas on what percentage of fuel sold must be blended biofuel. The market has had little trouble meeting these quotas - indeed, over 100% of the mandate was fulfilled in the first 9 months of 2012. As a result, demand plummeted, and the price for RIN (Renewable Identification Number, basically a unit of biofuel) crashed from an average of $1.30 to currently about $0.50. While the EPA is set to raise the mandate by about 30% next year, it looks to me like the market is having no trouble keeping up with the demand. That will keep prices low.
The fact is problematic when you understand that Dynamic Fuels' Geismar plant is deeply unprofitable even with over-$1 RIN costs. Since launching in late 2010, Syntroleum has swallowed over $21 million in equity-accounted losses in the joint venture. The plant has not operated anywhere near efficiency, consistently producing at only about 55% of capacity. When I see yearly mandates being met in 9 months, plummeting RIN prices, and low factory utilization, that screams over-supply to me. And in a commodity market, over-supply is bad, bad news for producers.
There are a few additional concerns aside from Dynamic Fuels. First, Syntroleum has been unable to find partners to commercialize the Syntroleum or Synfining processes, making me question to viability to commercialize them - ever. Second, the stock has traded well under $1 for most of the year, triggering a NASDAQ de-listing notice. While the company has recently applied for an extension, it seems likely to me that an already-approved (and embarrassing) reverse split may have to take place to save the listing.
The bull case for Syntroleum is one of wishes and hopes. Of course it would be great if we could take waste products and turn them into clean biodiesel, but organic demand just isn't happening right now. And, given the ever-expanding oil reserves being uncovered in the U.S., my feeling is that demand is unlikely to explode any time soon. Therefore, I recommend MFI investors step away from Syntroleum and look elsewhere.
Joel Greenblatt and MagicFormulaInvesting.com are not associated in any way with this website. Neither Mr. Greenblatt or MagicFormulaInvesting.com endorse this website's investment opinions, strategy, or products. Investment recommendations on this website are not chosen by Mr. Greenblatt, nor are they based on Mr. Greenblatt's proprietary investment model, and are not chosen by MagicFormulaInvesting.com. Magic Formula® is a registered trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com, which has no connection to this website. The information on this website is for informational purposes only and solely represents the views and opinions of the author. No warranty is provided or implied as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of this information. This information may not be construed as investment advice of any kind, nor can it be relied upon as the basis for stock trades. DON'T RELY SOLELY ON THIS WEBSITE'S INFORMATION OR STATISTICS! Please do your own research before buying. Alexander Online Properties LLC, the proprietor of this website, is not responsible in any way for losses or damages resulting from the use of this information. Alexander Online Properties LLC is not a registered investment advisor. All logos are trademarked properties of their respective companies.
© 2008-2017 Alexander Online Properties LLC