The Barrons 500 Ranked As Magic Formula Stocks
A couple of weeks ago, MagicDiligence wrote about how the Magic Formula Investing (MFI) strategy could theoretically be applied to any group of stocks. This is a perfect opportunity to put that into motion. I've taken the top 100 non-financial stocks from Barron's list and ranked them by the MFI method. The result should be a list of efficient, revenue growing stocks that are also have cheap stock prices! The full ranking list can be found here.
For the rest of this article, let's take a look at the top 10 in that list:
|APOL||Apollo Group, Inc.||$40.62||2011-02-28||26.3%||151.7%||1.44||1||81|
|RIMM||Research In Motion Limited||$44.85||2011-02-28||21.1%||96.2%||2.06||3||8|
|RAI||Reynolds American, Inc.||$37.50||2011-03-31||9.8%||124.6%||1.10||5||47|
|LLY||Eli Lilly and Company||$38.65||2011-03-31||15.9%||48.2%||2.01||6||103|
|ROST||Ross Stores, Inc.||$78.98||2011-01-31||10.2%||84.7%||1.51||8||63|
|GILD||Gilead Sciences, Inc.||$41.36||2010-12-31||10.5%||63.4%||2.32||10||75|
Magic Formula investors probably are not too surprised... 5 of those stocks are currently in the MFI screens, and most of the others have been in it within the past 6 months. Only 2 stocks - Oshkosh and Research in Motion - made the top 10 both by Barron's criteria and by MFI's. Additionally, one current MFI stock, Visa (V), was #10 on Barron's list but did not rank per my calculations.
Certainly there are reasons to be wary of some of them. Oshkosh is coming off of a huge government contract for mine resistant ATVs, and revenue is sure to drop going forward. Research In Motion, while still a growing company, has had to cut estimates this year and faces intense competition from Apple's (AAPL) iPhone/iPad and numerous devices running Google's (GOOG) Android operating system. Eli Lilly is facing a patent cliff from 2011-13 that threatens 40% of revenues. Reynolds pays a nice dividend and operates in an oligarchy with strong pricing power, but has few avenues for growth. So, clearly, there are reasons for some of these stocks to be cheap, but almost every stock becomes too cheap at some point. It can be argued that several of the aforementioned names may meet that description.
The second "basket" we can put these stocks into are ones that face likely short-term problems, making them potentially interesting to value investors. For example, Apollo Group has been suffering huge enrollment declines as they transform their business ahead of government regulations, but once this transition laps over, I believe investors will find current valuation levels far too low for the amount of ongoing business.
Lastly are the firms that just look plain undervalued, with no hugely concerning business challenges looming overhead. Gilead dominates the HIV drug space, has years of patent protections ahead, and is still growing at a slower but still healthy pace. CA is still viewed as a mainframe software company, but the truth is that the firm is investing heavily into growing sectors like software-as-a-service, security, and machine virtualization.
Joel Greenblatt and MagicFormulaInvesting.com are not associated in any way with this website. Neither Mr. Greenblatt or MagicFormulaInvesting.com endorse this website's investment opinions, strategy, or products. Investment recommendations on this website are not chosen by Mr. Greenblatt, nor are they based on Mr. Greenblatt's proprietary investment model, and are not chosen by MagicFormulaInvesting.com. Magic Formula® is a registered trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com, which has no connection to this website. The information on this website is for informational purposes only and solely represents the views and opinions of the author. No warranty is provided or implied as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of this information. This information may not be construed as investment advice of any kind, nor can it be relied upon as the basis for stock trades. DON'T RELY SOLELY ON THIS WEBSITE'S INFORMATION OR STATISTICS! Please do your own research before buying. Alexander Online Properties LLC, the proprietor of this website, is not responsible in any way for losses or damages resulting from the use of this information. Alexander Online Properties LLC is not a registered investment advisor. All logos are trademarked properties of their respective companies.
© 2008-2017 Alexander Online Properties LLC